Current:Home > MarketsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Mastery Money Tools
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-16 09:12:32
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (8)
Related
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- German chancellor tours flooded regions in the northwest, praises authorities and volunteers
- When is the 2024 Super Bowl? What fans should know about date, time, halftime performer
- Teen killed in Australia shark attack
- Trump issues order to ban transgender troops from serving openly in the military
- Massive waves threaten California, coast braces for another round after Ventura rogue wave
- Gymnast Shilese Jones Reveals How Her Late Father Sylvester Is Inspiring Her Road to the Olympics
- Beyond Times Square: A giant Peep, a wrench, a crab. A look at the weirdest NYE drops.
- Average rate on 30
- Laws banning semi-automatic weapons and library censorship to take effect in Illinois
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- 122 fishermen rescued after getting stranded on Minnesota ice floe, officials say
- Michigan woman waits 3 days to tell husband about big lottery win: 'I was trying to process'
- The year in review: Top news stories of 2023 month-by-month
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Detroit Pistons face final chance to avoid carrying NBA-record losing streak into 2024
- At the stroke of midnight, the New Year gives a clean slate for long-elusive resolutions
- States set to enact new laws in 2024 on guns, fuzzy dice and taxes
Recommendation
Moving abroad can be expensive: These 5 countries will 'pay' you to move there
These 12 Christmas Decor Storage Solutions Will Just Make Your Life Easier
Japan sees record number of bear attacks as ranges increase
32 things we learned in NFL Week 17: A revealing look at 2024
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
NFL playoff format: How many teams make it, how many rounds are there and more
Penn State defense overwhelmed by Ole Miss tempo and ‘too many moving parts’ in Peach Bowl loss
NFL playoff format: How many teams make it, how many rounds are there and more