Current:Home > NewsIndia’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status -Mastery Money Tools
India’s Supreme Court upholds government’s decision to remove disputed Kashmir’s special status
View
Date:2025-04-18 07:27:17
SRINAGAR, India (AP) — India’s top court on Monday upheld a 2019 decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government to strip disputed Jammu and Kashmir’s special status as a semi-autonomous region with a separate constitution and inherited protections on land and jobs.
The five-judge constitutional bench of the Supreme Court ruled that the region’s special status had been a “temporary provision” and that removing it in 2019 was constitutionally valid.
The unprecedented move also divided the region into two federal territories, Ladakh and Jammu-Kashmir, both ruled directly by the central government without a legislature of their own. As a result, the Muslim-majority region is now run by unelected government officials and has lost its flag, criminal code and constitution.
But Chief Justice Dhananjaya Yeshwant Chandrachud said the government has promised to restore Jammu-Kashmir’s statehood and should do so as soon as possible. Ladakh, however, will remain a federal territory.
He also ordered the country’s election commission to hold local legislative polls in the region by next Sept. 30.
The ruling is expected to boost the electoral prospects of Modi’s governing Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party in national polls next year. The 2019 move resonated in much of India, where the Modi government was cheered by supporters for fulfilling a long-held Hindu nationalist pledge to scrap the Muslim-majority region’s special status.
But the judgment will disappoint many in Kashmir, including the region’s main pro-India Kashmiri politicians who had petitioned the Supreme Court to reverse the deeply unpopular decision, which was imposed under an unprecedented security and communication clampdown that lasted many months.
The court’s hearings began in August and included extensive arguments and discussions on the move’s constitutional validity.
veryGood! (956)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Inside Clean Energy: A Dirty Scandal for a Clean Energy Leader
- Mike The Mover vs. The Furniture Police
- KitchenAid Mixer Flash Deal: Take $180 off During the Amazon Prime Day 2023 Sale
- DeepSeek: Did a little known Chinese startup cause a 'Sputnik moment' for AI?
- 'Wait Wait' for July 22, 2023: Live in Portland with Damian Lillard!
- Deep in the Democrats’ Climate Bill, Analysts See More Wins for Clean Energy Than Gifts for Fossil Fuel Business
- Ariana Madix Is Making Her Love Island USA Debut Alongside These Season 5 Singles
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Why Taylor Russell Supporting Harry Styles Has Social Media in a Frenzy
Ranking
- Grammy nominee Teddy Swims on love, growth and embracing change
- Home prices dip, Turkey's interest rate climbs, Amazon gets sued
- Meta's Threads wants to become a 'friendly' place by downgrading news and politics
- Melanie Griffith Covers Up Antonio Banderas Tattoo With Tribute to Dakota Johnson and Family
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Vanessa Hudgens' Amazon Prime Day 2023 Picks Will Elevate Your Self-Care Routine
- What to know about Prime, the Logan Paul drink that Sen. Schumer wants investigated
- Melanie Griffith Covers Up Antonio Banderas Tattoo With Tribute to Dakota Johnson and Family
Recommendation
Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
Netflix's pop-up eatery serves up an alternate reality as Hollywood grinds to a halt
Trisha Paytas Announces End of Podcast With Colleen Ballinger Amid Controversy
Remember Reaganomics? Freakonomics? Now there's Bidenomics
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
Tribes object. But a federal ruling approves construction of the largest lithium mine
Petition Circulators Are Telling California Voters that a Ballot Measure Would Ban New Oil and Gas Wells Near Homes. In Fact, It Would Do the Opposite
How a New ‘Battery Data Genome’ Project Will Use Vast Amounts of Information to Build Better EVs