Current:Home > ScamsFacebook scraps ad targeting based on politics, race and other 'sensitive' topics -Mastery Money Tools
Facebook scraps ad targeting based on politics, race and other 'sensitive' topics
View
Date:2025-04-13 16:24:38
The parent company of Facebook will no longer let advertisers target people based on how interested the social network thinks they are in "sensitive" topics including health, race and ethnicity, political affiliation, religion and sexual orientation.
Meta, which makes most of its $86 billion in annual sales from advertising, said it's making the "difficult decision" in an effort to stop advertisers from using ad targeting to discriminate against or otherwise harm users.
"We've heard concerns from experts that targeting options like these could be used in ways that lead to negative experiences for people in underrepresented groups," Meta official Graham Mudd wrote in a blog post on Tuesday.
To be clear, the targeting options are not based on a user's demographics or personal attributes, but on whether they have interacted with content on Facebook that is related to specific topics.
The changes take effect on January 10 across Meta's apps, including Facebook, Instagram, and Messenger, and its audience network, which places ads on other smartphone apps.
The targeting options have been popular with advertisers who want to reach users who have shown interest in particular issues. But this kind of targeting has also caused headaches for the social network — like when advertisers used it to show housing ads only to some people based on race and religion. (Facebook changed some of its ad tools in 2019 following lawsuits alleging illegal discrimination in housing, employment and credit ads.)
Outside critics and Facebook's own employees have pressured the company for years to overhaul its approach to ads, pointing to advertisers that microtargeted people with tailored messages, excluded people based on protected characteristics, and targeted ads by using anti-Semitic phrases.
But the company has resisted until now, arguing that advertising is an important part of free speech — especially when it comes to political messaging.
Meta is not doing away with targeting altogether. It will still allow advertisers to target ads based on age, gender, location and a slew of other interest categories that it doesn't consider "sensitive."
In Tuesday's blog post, Mudd acknowledged the change will have a cost for some advertisers, including small businesses, non-profits and advocacy groups. They won't be able to use interest-based targeting to promote causes such as lung cancer awareness or World Diabetes Day, or target users interested in same-sex marriage or Jewish holidays, for example.
"This was not a simple choice and required a balance of competing interests where there was advocacy in both directions," he wrote.
Editor's note: Meta pays NPR to license NPR content.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Will the Democrats’ Climate Legislation Hinge on Carbon Capture?
- Charity Lawson Shares the Must-Haves She Packed for The Bachelorette Including a $5 Essential
- New Florida Legislation Will Help the State Brace for Rising Sea Levels, but Doesn’t Address Its Underlying Cause
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Las Vegas police search home in connection to Tupac Shakur murder
- It Ends With Us Author Colleen Hoover Addresses Backlash Over Blake Lively's Costumes in Film
- Ex-USC dean sentenced to home confinement for bribery of Los Angeles County supervisor
- Google unveils a quantum chip. Could it help unlock the universe's deepest secrets?
- To Stop Line 3 Across Minnesota, an Indigenous Tribe Is Asserting the Legal Rights of Wild Rice
Ranking
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- China Provided Abundant Snow for the Winter Olympics, but at What Cost to the Environment?
- A Big Climate Warning from One of the Gulf of Maine’s Smallest Marine Creatures
- The Supreme Court’s EPA Ruling: A Loss of Authority for Federal Agencies or a Lesson for Conservatives in ‘Be Careful What You Wish For’?
- Rams vs. 49ers highlights: LA wins rainy defensive struggle in key divisional game
- Save 48% on a Ninja Foodi XL 10-In-1 Air Fry Smart Oven That Does the Work of Several Appliances
- The Fed already had a tough inflation fight. Now, it must deal with banks collapsing
- Florida couple pleads guilty to participating in the US Capitol attack
Recommendation
Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
Yes, The Bachelorette's Charity Lawson Has a Sassy Side and She's Ready to Show It
U.S. arrests a Chinese business tycoon in a $1 billion fraud conspiracy
After a Clash Over Costs and Carbon, a Minnesota Utility Wants to Step Back from Its Main Electricity Supplier
Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
The U.K. is the latest to ban TikTok on government phones because of security concerns
A Climate Progressive Leads a Crowded Democratic Field for Pittsburgh’s 12th Congressional District Seat
In Baltimore, Helping Congregations Prepare for a Stormier Future